Un total de 257 personas murieron violentamente entre enero y marzo anteriores, de acuerdo con registros de la Cruz Roja.

La mayoría de los fallecimientos ocurrieron durante accidentes de tránsito, especialmente choques (el 34 por ciento).

Este cuerpo de socorro también atendió durante este primer trimestre del presente año 24 asesinatos, casi todos con armas de fuego (el 26 por ciento de los casos).

So we have 257 violent deaths, of which 34% belong to traffic accidents. Then they say we had 24 murders, which accounts to 26% – but 24 is only 9% of 257. They could mean that 26% of people were murdered with firearms, but they said that almost all cases were firearms. Or maybe they actually mean that 34% was the number of collisions resulting in deaths. Then there’s 8 people who drowned, for 3%, leaving 37% of violent deaths unaccounted under miscellany.

Way to give out useless information.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

New Zealand’s Copyright Amendment Act assumes that you’re guilty the moment you’re accused because, well, that’s easier.

I kid you not, that’s a quote from a former MP. The burden of proof would of course be switched to the accused, since they’re the ones with an active interest in it.

Boy, I should look into moving into New Zealand. Sounds like it’s becoming a swell place. Can’t wait for this principle to be applied to other aspects of the law.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Very briefly they mention near the end that it’s only a correlation issue, but of course they lead in with causality. I’m not a religious person by far, but allow me to propose an alternative interpretation: this actually proves the existence of a god and he’s clearly testing the faithful, since clearly the more faithful there are, the more he tests them – that shows both intelligence and intent.

Come on. You’re not doing us atheists any favors with pieces such as that one.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

I’m a big proponent of anonymity, which is one of the components of Gabe’s evil brew – people just need to exercise better judgement when dealing with someone who they don’t know at all. On a case in the U.S., a woman signed up on MySpace under a fake name and harasses a girl, who then kills herself feeling she was being taunted by a boy she liked. Let’s leave aside the fact that the girl trusted this person she didn’t know, and then took such a rash decision based on their remarks. The woman who was taunting her was just convicted of charged with several felonies. She’s a immoral bastard for sure, but the problem is that the reasons they’re charging her with felonies amount to her breaking not the law, but MySpace’s terms of service.

There’s a pretty good analysis of the decision at SecurityFocus.

“Yet, legal experts argue that charging a person for violating computer-crime statutes because they broke the terms-of-service agreement of an online site could lead to the ability to charge nearly anyone with computer crime. Using residential broadband for business purposes? A violation of the terms of service and, thus, potentially a crime. Checking sports sites while at work? A violation of corporate policy and, thus, potentially a crime.”

While the discussion over at Technocrat sometimes veers off too much into someone oughta do something, Jim Hill asks a very good question:

The thing I can’t figure is why the ordinary homicide statutes don’t apply. “A person is presumed to intend the reasonably foreseeable consequences of his voluntary act.” That’s why we can and do outlaw “Fire!” in a theater and fighting words in a bar: you’re presumed to have intended the consequences.

If elaborately befriending a depressed 13-year-old girl by pretending to be the boy of her dreams, spending weeks earning her trust and adoration, and then publicly humiliating her with the kiss-off line “the world would be better off without you” isn’t an indicator of intent, then neither is pulling the trigger knowing which way the bullet’s going to go.

Why indeed? Maybe the prosecutor thought he couldn’t just win a manslaughter case with the evidence. Or maybe there’s a cherry on top for someone if the case was decided this way. From the same SecurityFocus analysis:

Making a violation of such agreements a crime would allow prosecutors the ability to investigate nearly any Internet user, Scott Greenfield, a criminal defense attorney, stated in an online analysis.

“Violating a website’s ‘TOS’ is carte blanche to an imaginative prosecutor,” Greenfield said. “We are all felons if this flies.”

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Last month a US court ruled that border agents can search your laptop, or any other electronic device, when you’re entering the country. They can take your computer and download its entire contents, or keep it for several days.

That’s from a Bruce Schneier article on The Guardian advising people on the invasions of privacy they will be subjected to while crossing customs, and what they can do about it.

He goes on to provide people suggestions on how to avoid their data being taken by random officers. You know that things are really bad when a very public mainstream figure like Schneier is advising people on how to avoid and deceive their “protectors”.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Scenario: Johnny falls while running during recess and scrapes his knee. He is found crying by his teacher, Heather. Heather hugs him to comfort him.

1967 – In a short time, Johnny feels better and goes on playing.

2007 – Heather is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job. She faces three years in state prison. Johnny undergoes five years of therapy.

A few days later he published a message he got about the post, a rather depressing note from a high school teacher. The teacher in question said,

I am a (male) high school teacher and I have a daughter. If I see a child or (worse) a pre-teen crying on the beach I change my direction and put as much distance as possible between us. It’s too dangerous even to take a picture, imagine TOUCHING them!

Even more heartbreaking was a friend’s comment about an article he remembered reading some time ago, about a man in the U.K. who saw a 4-year-old crying in a park but did not help because he was scared to be arrested as a pedophile – the child was later found dead.

But what really made my blood boil an article I saw on the New York Times article, about how
the original Sesame Street episodes are now advertised as intended for grown ups only.

Which brought Parente to a feature of “Sesame Street� that had not been reconstructed: the chronically mood-disordered Oscar the Grouch. On the first episode, Oscar seems irredeemably miserable — hypersensitive, sarcastic, misanthropic. (Bert, too, is described as grouchy; none of the characters, in fact, is especially sunshiney except maybe Ernie, who also seems slow.) “We might not be able to create a character like Oscar now,� she said.

Looking back, I can’t even imagine a kid-oriented show nowadays like The Muppet Show putting on a sketch with Roger Moore about all the evil muppets ineptly trying to murder him, or Alice Cooper offering Kermit a contract to sell his soul to the devil. Those were the shows I grew up with, shows that had imagination, where doing something offbeat was not extraordinary, but just business as usual. The shows that gave me a sense of wonder, and taught me that everything was valid.

Popular culture has been castrated.

Not all change is bad, of course. We’ve made advances in this time. Science has progressed significantly, and will continue to do so now that Sony sucks at putting out games and PlayStation3s everywhere are massively increasing the number of Folding@Home operations. It doesn’t escape me that you’re reading this on a medium that wasn’t accessible to most people 15 years ago.

But for me some things are fundamental, and cultural progress is one of them. North America has always had the great advantage of sheer mass: on such a large body of people, the strangest, most interesting things keep popping up. And yes, that’s how I define progress in culture – anything new, anything different that inspires people to experiment: I will not become a vegan decaf skin-brander like you, but I am glad your crazy movement sprung up. This trend risks being squashed by the homogenization of culture that’s going on in the U.S.

In short, I worried that I wouldn’t see the next Darkest of the Hillside Thickets appear (yes, they’re Canadian, but Canada is playing catch-up with the U.S. on so many things already).

My first consolation was that we have the Internet now. Soon bandwidth large enough for good quality video streaming will be commonplace, and applications such as Miro will make television and the FCC irrelevant once and for all.

And then I ran into this brilliant TED Talk conference with Larry Lessig, the founder of Creative Commons, about read/write culture and how extremism in the part of the copyright owners has engendered extremism on those who would use the content.

Near the end he makes a very lucid point: this age of prohibitions has had the effect of ordinary people knowingly living their life against the law, knowing that they’ve been branded criminals. While I’m sure that this (as he calls it) corrosive reality will have the effect of making some people feel more at home with real crimes, it will eventually end up with more and more regular folks seeing governmental and institutional impositions as irrelevant.

As an Ars Digita article mentions, referring to a study by an Utah professor who calculated he accumulates about $12.45 million dollars a day on copyright liability:

What better way could there be to create a nation of constant lawbreakers than to instill in that nation a contempt for its own laws? And what better way to instill contempt than to hand out rights so broad that most Americans simply find them absurd?

The more you tighten your grasp, the more star systems will slip through your fingers, to get really geeky.

That’s something to be hopeful about.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Individuals who are believed to have the cryptographic keys necessary for such decryption will face up to 5 years in prison for failing to comply with police or military orders to hand over either the cryptographic keys, or the data in a decrypted form.

Part 3, Section 49 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) includes provisions for the decryption requirements, which are applied differently based on the kind of investigation underway. As we reported last year, the five-year imprisonment penalty is reserved for cases involving anti-terrorism efforts. All other failures to comply can be met with a maximum two-year sentence.

The article itself points out that part of the idiocy is that this gives criminals an easy way out.

Yet the law, in a strange way, almost gives criminals an “out,” in that those caught potentially committing serious crimes may opt to refuse to decrypt incriminating data. A pedophile with a 2GB collection of encrypted kiddie porn may find it easier to do two years in the slammer than expose what he’s been up to.

Wrong country to live in if you care about your privacy.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The Risk of Journalism discusses Courage against the Junta, an article I found painful to read.

We disguised his identity before putting the interview to air. Later, I learned he had been arrested by secret police. For telling the world about Burmese political prisoners, he was jailed for seven years. I was shocked someone had been jailed for something I had done. It made me acutely aware of how many thousands of Burmese must feel when their relatives are arrested or killed by the regime. It’s the sense of powerlessness against injustice that is most dehumanising.

It did give me a bit of hope for this age:

The use of mobile phones to capture images of the protests are showing the world what is happening. They are fed back via the internet and opposition television stations run from as far afield as Oslo.

The inaccurately named Profits Trumps Freedom links to several articles regarding how foreign businesses are feeding Burma’s dictatorship, but misses the fact that the central problem are not the corporations that keep doing business with them, but the customers that don’t care and keep giving money to those specific companies. Corporations are not hulking behemoths hell-bent on Evil – they’re hell-bent on profits. Show them that certain business partners have a negative effect on their bottom line, and they’ll change their tune in a blink.

Then again, if you make a decision that 5% savings make it worth your while to deal with someone you consider evil, don’t point any fingers when the company in question does the same.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

“I think the best case scenario is that the dollar only loses half its value.”

Thanks for the link, Jorge.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Update: A much better angle which shows that the guy was restrained and already in handcuffs when he was tasered.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

There are red flags to be found in each telecom provider’s privacy policy. A close reading of Time Warner’s policy reveals:

* Along with knowing juicy details of your calling and viewing habits — those 900 numbers, say, or that subscription to the Playboy Channel — the company keeps track of “Internet addresses you contact and the duration of your visits to such addresses.”

* Time Warner not only compiles “information about how often and how long” you’re online, but also “purchases that you have made” via the company’s Road Runner portal, which provides access to thousands of goods.

* On top of that, the company may monitor “information you publish” via the Road Runner portal, which should send a chill through anyone who accesses his or her e-mail through Time Warner’s servers.

The disregard for privacy at companies like Time Warner go beyond merely their current customers, apparently.

At least you don’t have to worry about these companies knowing things about you after you take your business elsewhere, right?

Wrong.

Near the very bottom of Time Warner’s privacy policy, the company discloses that it maintains personally identifiable info about people “as long as you are a subscriber and up to 15 additional years.” This, it says, is for tax and accounting purposes.

The aptly titled Your Loss of privacy is a package deal is particularly timely, given today’s publication by a German operator of a Tor node (a network designed to give its users privacy while accessing the Internet) which details his arrest by the police a few months ago. Both the arrest and other privacy concerns are discussed in a CNet article.

What does this mean? That if you don’t protect your privacy now, not only nobody else will do it for you but there are several parties actively interested in taking it from you. On the online front, a good starting point is the Tor network, of which you can read more about here. If you require more reliable access, you can also consider commercial services such as Xerobank.

It takes barely any work, and if you have any interested in safeguarding your information, you should start now.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Faced with U.S. economic sanctions and a weak dollar, Tehran is demanding foreign energy companies do business in yen and euros, despite increasingly desperate need for investment.

In a deal announced last week, Japan’s Nippon Oil agreed to buy oil from Iran using yen instead of the traditional U.S. dollars. The agreement comes after years of Iranian efforts to shift its petroleum exports away from dollars and toward yen and euros.

[...]

The economic consequences of sanctions are not Iran’s only motivation. The declining value of the dollar has also made the euro and yen attractive, if not for sales, than at least for saving.

“There is also another key issue that you are seeing, not just in Iran, but in other oil producers, especially Gulf oil producers, is given the depreciation of the dollar, it is better to hold their reserves at least in euros, it is a better store of wealth. Some of the other Gulf producers will accept payment in euros. They won’t price their oil in euros or yen, and even if they are receiving payments in dollars, most likely they are converting a substantial share of that every month into other currency,� Kirsch said.

Here’s the full article.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The present database in England and Wales holds details of 4m people who are guilty or cleared of a crime.

Lord Justice Sedley said this was indefensible and biased against ethnic minorities, and it would be fairer to include everyone, guilty or innocent.

[...]

He said the only option was to expand the database to cover the whole population and all those who visited the UK, even for a weekend.

It’s hard to tell if Sedley is attempting to reduce the argument of a DNA database to its absurd extreme or if actually believes that this is an acceptable solution, but nothing in the article indicates he might be anything but serious.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Fifty-year-old Alistair Beckham was a successful British aerospace- projects engineer. His specialty was designing computer software for sophisticated naval defense systems. Like hundreds of other British scientists, he was working on a pilot program for America’s Strategic Defense Initiative–better known as Star Wars. And like at least 21 of his colleagues, he died a bizarre, violent death.

It was a lazy, sunny Sunday afternoon in August 1988. After driving his wife to work, Beckham walked through his garden to a musty backyard toolshed and sat down on a box next to the door. He wrapped bare wires around his chest, attached the to an electrical outlet and put a handkerchief in his mouth. Then he pulled the switch.

With his death, Beckham’s name was added to a growing list of British scientists who’ve died or disappeared under mysterious circumstances since 1982. Each was a skilled expert in computers, and each was working on a highly classified project for the American Star Wars program. None had any apparent motive for killing himself.

Each death was apparently under suspicious circumstances, and things have gotten even more so since people started asking questions:

“My solicitor instructed an accident specialist to examine the automobile,” Mrs. Bowden explains. “Somebody had taken the wheels off and put others on that were old and worn. At the inquest this was not allowed to be brought up. Someone asked if the car was in a sound condition, and the answer was yes.”

Hillary, in a state of shock, never protested the published verdict. Yet, she remains convinced that someone tampered with her husband’s car. “It certainly looked like foul play,” Hillary maintains.

And

Investigating journalists found discrepancies in other evidence. “A police report noted a puncture mark on Dijabhai’s left buttock after his fall from the bridge,” explains Tony Collins, who covered the story for Britain’s COMPUTER NEWS magazine. “Apparently, this was the reason his funeral was halted seconds before the cremation was to take place.

[...]

“It’s been almost impossible to get to information about deaths that should be in the public domain,” Tony Collins laments. “I’ve been given false names or incorrect spellings, or I’ve not been told where inquests have taken place. It’s made it very difficult for me to try to track down the details of these cases.”

Here’s the full article. A very interesting read, particularly for those with paranoid inclinations.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Like most Marines and former Marines, she is largely apolitical. The fact is, most Marines are trigger pullers and most trigger pullers could care less who the President is. They simply want to be the tip of the sword when it comes to defending the country. She voted once in her life and otherwise was always in some forward post on the water during election season.

Something is wrong with the Navy and the Marines in her view. Always ready to go in harms way, Marines rarely ever question unless it’s a matter of tactics or honor. But something seems awry. Junior and senior officers are starting to grumble, roll their eyes in the hallways. The strain of deployments is beginning to hit every jot and tittle of the Marines and it’s beginning to seep into the daily conversation of Marines and Naval officers in command decision.

“I know this will sound crazy coming from a Naval officer”, she said. “But we’re all just waiting for this administration to end. Things that happen at the senior officer level seem more and more to happen outside of the purview of XOs and other officers who typically have a say-so in daily combat and flight operations. Today, orders just come down from the mountaintop and there’s no questioning. In fact, there is no discussing it. I have seen more than one senior commander disappear and then three weeks later we find out that he has been replaced. That’s really weird. It’s also really weird because everyone who has disappeared has questioned whether or not we should be staging a massive attack on Iran.”

She goes on:

I asked her about the attack, how limited and so forth.

“I don’t think it’s limited at all. We are shipping in and assigning every damn Tomahawk we have in inventory. I think this is going to be massive and sudden, like thousands of targets. I believe that no American will know when it happens until after it happens.”

This is very close to a news story that got published independently on The Times:

The Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert.

Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes� against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,� he said.

Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.� It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus�.

Things are going to hell in a hand basket. Fast.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Crimes commonly considered to be felonies include, but are not limited to: aggravated assault and/or battery, arson, burglary, some instances of drug possession (dependent on the jurisdiction, often possession over a certain weight, based on the type of drug, is held to indicate intent to sell or distribute), embezzlement, grand theft, treason, espionage, racketeering, robbery, murder, rape, kidnapping, cannabis cultivation and fraud. A third offense for driving under the influence is also a felony in most states.

So treason, arson, murder and rape. Boy these people take their parking lots seriously.

But wait, let’s hear the explanation for the overreacting authorities:

You see powder connected by arrows and chalk, you never know,� she said. “It could be a terrorist, it could be something more serious. We’re thankful it wasn’t, but there were a lot of resources that went into figuring that out.�

Here’s the original new item along with Bruce Schneier’s comments.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Now a guy in the U.S. who has been convicted of uploading a copy of the Star Wars movie has been forced by the court to switch to Windows if he wants to use a computer, because they want to track him using software that is not available on Linux.

Lord knows we need them dangerous criminals tracked.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.